Physicians’ answering
services
could impede patient care, study shows
A new study conducted by researchers at the University of Colorado Denver suggests
patients who are ill may experience unnecessary delays in their care when
calling physicians’ telephone answering services, which could negatively
affect patient health.
The study, published in the March 2003 Journal of Family Practice, found
patients who call after-hours are confronted with multiple barriers before
receiving appropriate care. According to David E. Hildebrandt, PhD, co-author
of the study, patients often must call a second telephone number, choose
from several options on the phone system, or decide whether their problem
is a “true emergency.”
Almost 90 percent of the physicians’ offices studied required the patient
to decide if his or her problem was an emergency. About 10 percent of these
patients decided that their problem was not an emergency, but half of these
patients, or 5 percent overall, potentially had a true emergency as determined
by a panel of expert clinicians.
“We cannot expect an answering service operator to know how to triage patients,” Dr.
Hildebrandt said. “In studying these calls, we found several barriers
between patients and physicians: wrong numbers, messages necessitating a
second phone call and requirements that the patient decide the severity of
his or her complaint. These barriers may negatively affect patient health
due to unnecessary delays in evaluation and treatment.”
Some of these calls included symptoms such as chest pain running down the
left arm, difficulty breathing, pre-term labor and a person with a severe
cut to the hand. However, none of these patients were connected to a doctor
when they called because they did not tell the answering service that their
problem was an emergency.
Researchers with the UCD’s Department of Family
Medicine estimate that there are between 50 million and 100 million after-hours
calls to physicians each year. If 10 percent of those calls do not get through
to a physician and one-half of them may be serious, then as many as 2.5 million
to 5 million callers may suffer potentially dangerous delays in care.
“We urge physicians to have their answering service send all clinical calls
through for the doctor to manage,” said John M. Westfall, MD, MPH,
co-author of the study. “Patients who are ill should not be asked to
decide if their problem is an emergency.”
Return to Vivat Online Front Page